\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{amssymb,multicol, graphicx, color, amsthm, hyperref, amsmath, verbatim, caption, subcaption}
\setlength{\parskip}{8pt}

\newtheorem{theorem}{Theorem}
\newtheorem{lemma}{Lemma}
\newtheorem{corollary}{Corollary}
\renewcommand{\today}{}
\newcommand{\abs}[1]{\left| #1\right|}


\addtolength{\topmargin}{-.875in}
\addtolength{\textheight}{1.75in}

\newcommand{\solution}[1]{
\begin{quote}\color{red}Solution:\quad 
\color{black} #1
\end{quote}
}
\newcommand{\Z}{\mathbb{Z}}
\newcommand{\R}{\mathbb{R}}
\newcommand{\Q}{\mathbb{Q}}
\newcommand{\C}{\mathbb{C}}
\newcommand{\ba}{\backslash}

\begin{document}
\title{Math 101 Homework}
\author{Mary Radcliffe}
\date{due 17 Feb 2015}
\maketitle

Answer the following questions.

\begin{enumerate}


\item We proved in class that if we take a map-type coloring of the plane, it must use at least 6 colors. What does this suggest to you about $\chi(\R^2)$? Do you think measurable coloring is a good idea? Compare measurable coloring to map-type coloring. Which do you think is more useful in terms of understanding the chromatic number of the plane? Why?


\end{enumerate}









\end{document}