> Or you could stop playing the "I have a secret game", which would involve
> either saying where your doom-and-gloom prophecies come from or, again,
> just stop talking about them.
Well, I was trying to protect myself in this case, but seeing as I'm already a pariah: The reason I think this is a legitimate threat is it's the advice I gave.
He asked me for advice on why the domain is continuing along this path. I responded: The people in this domain will continue as long as there is neither risk nor consequence of not having a DST. The only real way you can get them to advance the process in some way is by providing those. Since he's the RST, the only legitimate way he can provide such is by exerting his veto power on the VSS', and a precedent that allows him to do so while still giving us time is lack of DST reports. I also advised him that if he did this, there are people in this domain stubborn enough to try to call the bluff.
Shortly after the election flopped, this is precisely what he did. Thus I have legitimate reason to believe that he will follow through.
Quod Erat Demonstrandum
Mike K
US2002022250