On 7/29/05, Michael Krotscheck
There is no dismismal coming from me. You are the one being flippant
and dismissive. I see the merits of your opinion and I disagree with
it. I think you are perscribing elements of other people's arguments
to me, or perhaps reading in to my statements an opinion that is not
there.
If, by action beyond our control, we are unable to perform a task, why
are we to be held accountable for it? Especially considering that the
task is at the request of the same structure that has removed our
capacity to complete it?
Granted, we could have a DST right now, but it is obvious that many
members of the Domain feel that that would compromise other issues
which are important to them. In my mind, as I suspect is in theirs,
the "fault" for our lack of DST is on Alex T, et al, and any
penalties, were they to be incurred, should fall to him. HOWEVER, as
that issue is currently in discussion and the question of fault is
undecided, it only stands to reason that some other exemption should
mitigate further harm to any parties involved, eg: dissolution of the
Domain for failing to report.
- Donald Sheldon
> See, Don, that's exactly what Group Think means. You're so confident in
> your own right-ness that you dismiss any divergent opinion as
> inappropriate, incorrect, invalid, uninformed, or just plain dumb. *Just*
> like you've dismissed mine. After all, I don't belong to your social
> solidarity network, and I've committed the crime of disagreeing with you!
> How could I possibly have a valid opinion!
US2002022644
"I've been watching too much Law & Order"
Henry Towsner
Last modified: Tue Aug 2 15:38:54 PDT 2005