> There seemed to be a number of problems with Kris' original e-mail. He
> stated that Sameer and Brian would not be allowed to run; while Jon has
> the authority to arbitrarily prevent people from running, I fail to see
> why Sameer and Brian should not be allowed to run in this case.
Because the Membership Handbook indicates that if an election ends with none of the candidates receiving 50% of the vote, then a new election must be run in which none of the previous candidates are eligable (MH pg. 86-87). I'm afraid that one's totally in keeping with the rules...
Michael Prettiman
US2002022648