5//05

Back

On 5/17/05, Jon Herrmann wrote:
> Okay, folks, here's the bottom line, without sugar coating. Alex has
> declined to answer any more questions on this over this medium. If
> you're not happy with that, then the next level of "appeal"- and I use
> that term loosely- is White Wolf. Barring a decision from Mike Tinney,
> this case is closed. I realize that won't be popular, but that's the
> real deal. Anyone who wants to go on about how this is unfair and
> Global has no accountability can do so, within the limits of the CoC,
> or in a terrific rant in a location not covered by the CoC. But that's
> the fact in this case.

Considering that it has been made clear that Alex T and/or Charles Bailey are not reading this discussion nor aware of it, what is the current club's policy on Open Door style emails.

If kept appropriate and focused to the public facts at hand, is it inherently inappropriate for a member to contact those that imposed this action upon the Domain to make clear to them your objection to their actions? To make it perfectly clear: I wish to, as a general member, express to them my disapproval of this action and its given justifications.

I must give mad props to Jon for listening to us, and giving us all the information and interpretation that he can on this matter. --
Tom Black * arsenacho@gmail.com* US2002-02-1951

Back