>
> > > Part of the ruling limits the ability of Jason and Mike to hold ST
> > > office; hence my comment on their re-electability. That's all I meant
> > > with that.
> >
> > And now I'm confused again. The MST has no authority to bar people from
> > holding office. Is there something else we don't know about going on?
>
> The MST, as a Global officer, is not necessarily bound by the MH.
> Even so, to the best of my knowledge, this is one of the aspects that
> was issued under the combined authority of the MST and the Club
> Director. Hope that clarifies.
>
Ummm I'm curious. Are you saying that the "Global Officers" are not bound by the Membership Handbook as submitted by the Camarilla Fan Club through it's parent corporate entity White Wolf? You use the word "necessarily" which could also indicate that they are bound by some strictures and not by others. If this later is the case, which parts of the Membership Handbook are the members who are "Global Officers" bound by and which ones can they ignore?
I've been silent up till know, but there are some concerns with how this was handled. It would almost appear that there really needs to be no effort picking a new DST because if they say anything that the MST doesn't like, or doesn't do exactly what the MST instructs when the MST instructs, they will be cast out with no explanation. That being so, I recomend we not bother with electing, we just ask the MST to pick which person here in this Domain least offends him. Sorry Strauss, that leasve you and me out...
Michael Shaffer
US2003082207