Anthony,
Personnlly, I think that most of the CoC is for whinny babies who are way
too sensitive. You know that I really could care less if anyone is offended.
Especially when it is my intention to offend someone (which is where this is
gettin really close to). But thank you very much for your concern. And
perhaps, just because its you, I'll try to tone it down a bit...but thats
only until people start acting stupid. Then its no hold barred.
Dan Murphy
US200203585
On 9/7/05, Anthony C. [name redacted at Anthonys request] <daslurpee@...> wrote:
>
> Dan-
>
> You've made many accusations. You've let your feelings be known. I'm glad
> that you've had an opportunity to share your feelings on the subject with
> the domain.
>
> However, I think you might be slightly offensive with your questions. I
> urge
> you to protect yourself from Code of Conduct violations by reducing the
> aggressiveness with which you post. You may find others more inclined to
> respond positively if you phrase your questions with a bit more restraint.
>
> We're having a lively debate, but we should also have a civil one.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Anthony C. [name redacted at Anthonys request]
> US2003021263
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Dan Murphy" <daniel.murphy.1@...>
> To: <steelshadows@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, September 07, 2005 6:41 PM
> Subject: Re: [steelshadows] Hello from the NC
>
>
> > Wes,
> > seriously, why would i/we bring this up to charles when he is clearly as
> > guilty as Alex? they are just watching earchothers backs, because as
> much
> as
> > everyone says its not, the CAM is an Old Boys Network.
> > Dan Murphy
> > US2002023585
> >
> > On 9/7/05, US National Coordinator <cam.usnc@...> wrote:
> > >
> > > On 9/7/05, Michael Strauss <mikestrauss@...> wrote:
> > > > Actually, as you've proven in your e-mails, there is "getting off on
> a
> > > > technicality" in the Cam. Alex's actions were clearly against the
> CoC
> > > and in
> > > > violation of CMH. As a member of the Camarilla USA, he can be
> punished
> > > by his
> > > > DC, RC, and NC (you). As a TECHNICALITY, his actions were taken
> while
> > > acting
> > > > as MST, and thus, you claim, only punishable by the Club Director.
> Thus,
> > > Alex
> > > > gets off on a technicality, while Jason doesn't.
> > >
> > > I don't really consider that a "technicality," at least not the way I
> > > use the term.
> > >
> > > If it really is that clear that Alex violated the code of conduct,
> > > though, has that been reported (politely and reasonably) to the club
> > > director? Does he agree?
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Wes Contreras, US2002022038
> > > US National Coordinator
> > > cam.usnc@...
> > > http://www.camarilla.us/
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Visit our Domain Website at:
> > > http://www.steelshadows.com
> > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Visit our Domain Website at:
> > http://www.steelshadows.com
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
> Visit our Domain Website at:
> http://www.steelshadows.com
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]