On 9/7/05, Tom Black <arsenacho@...> wrote:
>
> Wes, a specific question for you. It is my understanding that during
> the processing of the appeal, the effects of the pending action were
> already in effect against Jason (removal from office). If this is
> true, why did this departure from stated rules occur?
The appeal did not address the removal from office - only being barred
from office for a year. The removal itself was not contested in the
appeal.
--=20
Wes Contreras, US2002022038
US National Coordinator
cam.usnc@...
http://www.camarilla.us/