Wed, 07 Sep 2005 15:53:04 -0400

Back
Previous Next

--On Tuesday, September 06, 2005 10:18 AM -0700 US National Coordinator
<cam.usnc@...> wrote:

> loss, but it did warrant action. Personally, I pegged it at around a
> moderate offense, and extended the time without office while negating
> any prestige loss or full suspension. I can't speak for how anyone
> else arrived at the six month figure, of course.

On that matter- what is your opinion on the suggestion that, after
Jason's punishment is up, the RST will likely discard any application that
he submits for DST for an additional six months on the sole basis that he
recently was subjected to a disciplinary action. Is this a fair use of the
screening process, or is it simply adding insult to injury?

Karl Greenley
US2002023089

Back
Previous Next