--- In steelshadows@yahoogroups.com, US National Coordinator
<cam.usnc@g...> wrote:
> Henry, I know you're trying to make points that you believe in, but
> we're arguing in circles. You're trying to rules-lawyer this into a
> single definitive and simple statement so that you can attack it, but
> the situation just plain isn't that simple. Each individual component
> is arguable, and no component in isolation would be enough, I think,
> to warrant disciplinary action. Only when taken in total does it look
> like there's a problem.
Wes,
Honestly, I don't understand what's so difficult about this. You
voted to punish Jason. That means you should be able to provide a
list of actual things Jason did wrong to justify that. Yes, each
individual component may be arguable, but if you're punishing someone
for it, you'd better be able to win every one of those arguments.
Yes, each individual component may be too small to warrant punishment
alone, but each component should actually exist.
You may feel like you've clearly communicated what Jason did wrong, as
I'm sure you're trying to do, but I still have no idea what
specifically he was convicted of.
So, I'll ask directly: what should Jason have done in order to
properly follow Camarilla rules?
Also, I'd like to ask again: what action has been taken regarding Mr.
Bailey's failure to respect Jason's rights during this process.
Henry Towsner
US2003112558