On 9/7/05, Dale Sheldon <dales@...> wrote:
> > Like I explained elsewhere, that's a defense that just doesn't hold any
> > weight with me no matter how hard you argue procedures and semantics. I=
f
> > Jason didn't have any influence over Dale, or maybe had he tried to
> > exercise that influence and failed, then it would be more convincing.
>=20
> They didn't even bother to check. No one ever asked me. If that were to
> be the basis of their argument, wouldn't it be intelligent to ask?
Jason didn't make any claims for me to investigate, so what exactly
would I be asking? If his appeal had said "sure, I was arguing, but I
told Dale to handle the app as if I weren't," then I would take that
into consideration (after checking with you). His appeal didn't say
that, so I didn't consider it as a factor.
Later, during this thread, someone brought it up as a possible
defense, and I pointed out that I didn't think it would matter much,
and I speculated a bit.
(From Dale's next email)
> I said the same things as Mike and Jason did in the database. I am just
> as culpable as they are, I just said them a week later.
I haven't read your comments, so I couldn't say much about them. If
your questions haven't been addressed yet, I'd suggest talking to
Charles about getting Alex to respond in a more timely manner.
--=20
Wes Contreras, US2002022038
US National Coordinator
cam.usnc@...
http://www.camarilla.us/