On 9/6/05, Mathew Monroe <mmex@...> wrote:
>
> In a perfect world what exactly should Jason have done? Without a
> standard to hold things up to it is impossible to effectively determine
> the extent of wrong doing. It is very easy rationalize and justify
> behavior when there is no clear standard for appropriate behavior.
I can think of a few ways to handle it, but one example would be for
Jason to have instructed Mike to step away from this particular issue,
turned Mike's possible CoC violations over to the coordinator chain,
and taken his concerns about the approval item to the MST via email so
that it didn't get in the way of getting everything done in the
database. Maybe stick a note in the database along the lines of "sorry
folks, nothing to see here, taking my concerns to email, so please
continue on as normal and ignore the rant behind the curtain."
Certainly not the only valid approach, but one of several that I would
have personally found no fault in.
--=20
Wes Contreras, US2002022038
US National Coordinator
cam.usnc@...
http://www.camarilla.us/