On 9/6/05, Karl <greenley+cam@...> wrote:
>
> The word "approval", I think is what is at task, since that's a strongl=
y
> defined word in context. Specifically that it's not a "notification".
>=20
> That may well be reading too much into what was actually meant (not
> formal approval, per se) but is not an unreasonable interpretation.
The Addendum says that it's an approval, not a notification.
However, the MST can rewrite the Addendum entirely, or make exceptions
on a case by case basis. Like he did here.
Whether or not you disagree with the MST making an exception in this
particular case, he does have the authority to do so.
--=20
Wes Contreras, US2002022038
US National Coordinator
cam.usnc@...
http://www.camarilla.us/