--On Tuesday, September 06, 2005 2:24 PM -0700 US National Coordinator
<cam.usnc@...> wrote:
> On 9/6/05, Charlie Collins <cwc+@...> wrote:
>>
>> As for it being something that "should not require much time for
>> deliberation", I disagree.
>> This application violated the Addendum, and therefore questioning and
>> discussion should not be unexpected.
>
>> The Addendum also allows exceptions to the itself with MST
>> approval, and of course the MST has the power to rewrite the document if
>> he so chooses.
>
> Given the second quote here, I'm having trouble seeing where it
> violates the Addendum for the MST to make an exception for this
> application.
The word "approval", I think is what is at task, since that's a strongly
defined word in context. Specifically that it's not a "notification".
That may well be reading too much into what was actually meant (not
formal approval, per se) but is not an unreasonable interpretation.
Karl Greenley
US2002023089