On 9/6/05, Don Sheldon <don.sheldon@...> wrote:
> Was the council made aware that the notification in question never
> reached the DST level? I believe that it is still, to this day,
> pending VST approval. Jason never had the opportunity to fulfil
> Alex's request.
I am aware of that, and I believe that information was available to
the Council as a whole.
> Would this information have changed your decision? The decision of
> the Council as a whole?
It didn't change mine. If I were a VST, and I saw my boss making
comments like that on the application, I wouldn't touch it with a
10-foot pole until the situation got resolved one way or the other. By
the same token, the DST supervises the VSTs as well, and should have
been addressing any lack of activity on the VST's part as well. So
while it may be an indication that the VST is also at fault (though
perhaps not; I don't know), it doesn't indicate that the DST is any
less at fault. To me at least.
I presume Alex, David, and Jon have reasons for not having instructed
the VST to deal with the app in a timely manner, possibly because they
were waiting for the appeal to conclude, though that's pure conjecture
on my part.
--=20
Wes Contreras, US2002022038
US National Coordinator
cam.usnc@...
http://www.camarilla.us/