On 8/31/05, Jed Stancato Camarilla Email <xavier_oconnor@...> wrote:
> The council would have the specifics on the whole
> thing. However, they chose to uphold the punishment...
> so I would have to say there must have been some
> legitimacy to the charge... otherwise 6 people could
> not have voted in any way to uphold if it weren't. I
> trust in the Council to be fair.
I appolgize, I must have been unclear. I am aware that the council
has decided and I don't intend to work against that. My question was
what the charge was. What was it that six people agreed Jason had
done wrongly? If for no other reason, I'd want any future DSTs to be
aware of what their boundries are.
(Bad time for that use of legitimate, I suppose.)
- Donald Sheldon
US2002022644