Sat, 27 Aug 2005 17:41:50 -0400

Back
Previous Next

On 8/27/05, Jed Stancato Camarilla Email <xavier_oconnor@...> wrote:
> I did say that I would look at disciplinary actions as
> a consideration, but I also qualified that in the
> sense that if it was a less than recent disciplinary
> action (aka roughly 6 months to a year), I would
> dismiss it when considering people. Coming off fresh
> from disciplinary action and then applying for
> position, I too would remove that member from
> candidacy because they have not had the chance to
> return to the camarilla at large. Jon is not doing
> anything contrary to what I said... in fact he would
> be in line with my thoughts on it as well.

Why is there redundancy here? The punishment is specifically to
prevent Jason from holding offices.

Once that punishment (as altered by the Council) is fulfilled, why is
he being further impeded in the same fashion for another 6 months? Or
was the effect of the change to reduce his effective sentence from 18
months down to 12?
--=20
Tom Black * arsenacho@...
US2002-02-1951

Back
Previous Next